Here at Newsner, we’ve explained ‘graysexual‘, ‘demisexual‘ and ‘almondsexual‘ over the past year or so, bringing our readers up to speed as we find out for ourselves in real time. Call it a sign of the times, perhaps, but it seems like there are new ways, new labels for one to define their experiences of attraction being created constantly. Now, let me make it clear that I don’t have anything specifically against this. I’m not some grumpy curmudgeon resisting change and vehemently complaining because things aren’t exactly the way they used to be. That said, it can all get a bit confusing. It seems like there are so many ways for people to identify, such a large spectrum of words with which to describe one’s sexuality and preferences when it comes to attraction, that it’s impossible to keep track. Which is why we’re doing our best to keep people informed and updated. In that vein, we thought it only right to shed some light on the concept of being “berrisexual”. As per repo...
A high-stakes political moment has ignited a firestorm of controversy, forcing the shadows surrounding one of history’s most notorious predators back into the blinding light of public scrutiny. When Melania Trump took to the podium in the White House Grand Foyer to firmly distance herself from Jeffrey Epstein, she likely expected to close a chapter of persistent rumors. Instead, her declaration triggered a visceral, immediate backlash from the very women who suffered at the hands of the late financier as they felt their own painful experiences were being sidelined by a narrative of convenience. In her address, the former First Lady was unequivocal: she claimed no connection to Epstein, denied he had any role in her introduction to Donald Trump, and asserted she was never a victim or a participant in his world. She dismissed a resurfaced 2002 email—in which she wrote to Epstein’s accomplice, Ghislaine Maxwell, about a magazine feature—as nothing more than a “trivial note.” For the...